Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Review: Superman (2025)


At one point during James Gunn's Superman, our titular hero is trying to prevent casualties during a kaiju attack and among those he saves is a squirrel.  Test audiences hated it, but as James Gunn himself put it: "I really miss the squirrel. He's gotta save the squirrel."  And nothing better proves how perfect he was to direct this movie than his insistence on keeping that in.

See, I've never really connected with Superman as far as superheroes go.  I never held anything against him, he just always seemed a little too cheesy, a little too corny, a little too earnest for my tastes.  Granted, I grew up in the cynical 90s and as a gay teen in Texas, I was dripping with said cynicism, so it was going to be an uphill battle for me given that I only casually read comics even at that point.

Despite that fact, I knew enough about him to know that the movies that came out in my later years were either misreadings (Superman Returns, 2006) or outright insults (Man of Steel, 2013) to the character.  Even worse, many of the movies themselves were mediocre or bad, so it seemed like he was doomed to forever be sidelined as Marvel became a juggernaut while the DC movies were only occasionally good.

Then along came this movie.  I won't say it completely changed my opinion of the hero - I'll always be a bit too jaded to fully embrace him - but at last it appears we have a director who not only understands but leans into the corniness that is a cornerstone of the character.

And this Superman, as played by David Corenswet, is a cornball.  Trying to avoid killing at all costs - even against enemies - and working to save anything and anyone while saving the day.  He hardly swears - the one notable one is darkly funny when it occurs - and the incident that sets off the main plot of the film isn't because of an attack or because his fortress was broken into, but because someone took his dog.

Speaking of that main plot, the trailers (thankfully) don't reveal much of it.  The basic elements are there - Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult) wants to get Superman out of the way, people mistrust Superman after Lex's shenanigans, and ultimately Superman has to save the day - but so much of the meat and potatoes is left out of the trailers that I hope the film's success convinces other studios to stop showing so much.  It also takes the bold step of beginning at a point where Superman is already established and known - saving us from rehashing his well-tread origin story yet another time.

I also have to hand it to Gunn for his casting choices - not a single actor feels out of place and in many cases it feels like the perfect person was chosen for the role.  Hoult absolutely nails Lex Luthor and I only hesitate in giving him best-in-show because Edi Gathegi (as Mister Terrific) comes close to stealing the movie out-from-under the rest of the cast.  Rachel Brosnahan, as Lois Lane, also nails the character in a way we haven't seen since Margot Kidder and even the smaller roles of Green Lantern (Nathan Fillion), Hawkgirl (Isabela Merced), and Eve Teschmacher (Sara Sampaio) all add flavor that feels just right for what the film is going for.

Gunn has proven with his previous superhero films that he knows how to stage an action scene, and that continues here.  None of the fights feels derivative of his other films however, and it weirdly feels like he matches the action to the 'vibe' of the character (for lack of a better word) in inspired ways.  It's an underrated aspect of his direction.

All this to say: This is a damn good movie.  It might not ever be among my favorites, in general or even within this genre, but this is damn good filmmaking.

8.5 out of 10.  And thank God he saved that squirrel.

Sunday, July 20, 2025

Review: I Know What You Did Last Summer (2025)


Man, the feelings I have for this movie are mixed...

I really don't think I can give a better review than that simple sentence, but I will try.  The 2025 version of I Know What You Did Last Summer (which I will refer to as I Know... for the rest of this review) does so many things right that I want to give it a high score simply for avoiding so many of the dangerous mistakes that have plagued legacy sequels in this genre (think the 2022 Texas Chainsaw Massacre or the two worse movies in the recent Halloween trilogy) but manages to make a few new ones of its own that make me want to almost immediately take back all the points it earned.

Set 27 years after the original movie, this sequel follows a new group that makes a similar - though noticeably different - mistake that results in the death of someone they don't know.  They agree to keep it a secret, but one year later Ava (Chase Sui Wonders) receives a note very similar to the one received by Julie in the original.  People start to die, the police are of no help, and the group of now-estranged friends have to figure out who was connected to their victim and how to stop them.

If this sounds the same as the original, that is intentional.  The movie knows the formula and isn't going to mess with it too much - there will be subversions and twists, but nothing that will seriously rock the boat.  It's honestly kind of refreshing that the movie isn't pretending to be more than it is (a problem that has plagued many other legacy sequels) and the subversions it does scatter throughout are enough to keep it fresh.

The performances are mostly good, with returning actors Jennifer Love Hewitt and Freddie Prinze, Jr being best in show.  Which is not to say the newcomers are bad: Chase Sui Wonders does a great job, and Madelyn Cline as lead Danica Richards is a worthy successor to Hewitt's Julie James.  The other members of the friend group - Milo, Teddy, and Stevie (Jonah Hauer-King, Tyriq Withers, and Sarah Pidgeon) have less to do, but all of the actors do a good job of portraying a fractured friend group.

Again, this movie gets so much right that it is frustrating to see it fail in several substantial ways.  The biggest is the reveal of the killer.  I don't think anyone was really surprised at the reveal, which really kills the tension as the climax approaches, and it also doesn't feel very earned.  It's a weird thing to feel about a teen-oriented slasher, but for the character selected to be the murderer to work, there needs to be better build-up - especially if they are going to have to sell a 'killer monologue' at the same time.

The movie also struggles a bit with the side characters.  While some are very obviously meant to be cannon fodder, some still feel like substantial portions of their character were cut.  In particular, Tyler (Gabbriette Bechtel) feels like she should have been a much larger character than what was in the final cut of the film.

I can't say that casual fans of the genre won't enjoy the movie - I Know... moves at a good pace and is judicious in how it spreads out the kills - but there isn't much in the way of gore or even inventive kills so it the movie so the more hardcore horror fans might only see it if they have nostalgia for the original.  However, it is nice to see the familiar faces in this movie, and it is smart enough to hint at two possible hooks for sequels (no pun intended).

I'll tentatively give it a 6 out of 10 - but I could see it moving in either direction after more time sitting on it.